R50 and RF-S 55-210
RLight
Thought I'd throw in a few shots from the weekend as this is a fresh lens. The R50 may share the R10 sensor, but the lens is new-new. SOOC JPEGs, which I might argue, is who it should be. RAWs although flexible, if we're being honest are to fine tune a shot. If the SOOC JPEG didn't need tuning, do you need a RAW? I'll leave it at that. I am a RAW shooter btw...
Colorado4X4
Really nice shots! I’m looking to upgrade my M50 mainly for video quality to the R50 or something else, but I have no complaints about image quality in the M50. Looks like it’s doing a great job!
MAC
RLight wrote:Thought I'd throw in a few shots from the weekend as this is a fresh lens. The R50 may share the R10 sensor, but the lens is new-new. SOOC JPEGs, which I might argue, is who it should be. RAWs although flexible, if we're being honest are to fine tune a shot. If the SOOC JPEG didn't need tuning, do you need a RAW? I'll leave it at that. I am a RAW shooter btw...raw could have helped here with highlight recoverycool sunstar reflection going on in this onelooks like even with stm lens, subject tracking worked well in swing modethe best of the bunch, this tele is nice in good light for thesewhere did the wheels goit looks like you are enjoying eye tracking - Canon is really making its great new AF ubiquitous in its latest cameras
RLight
Colorado4X4 wrote:Really nice shots! I’m looking to upgrade my M50 mainly for video quality to the R50 or something else, but I have no complaints about image quality in the M50. Looks like it’s doing a great job!The video quality is fantastic. It had me thinking about IPB light on my R3. I say thinking as after testing, shooting ALL-I and then converting later on the computer does yield better quality, but, takes FOREVER. My computer was chomping most of yesterday on my R3 footage converting it for viewing on my Roku TV which doesn’t like / can’t take ALL-I.The R50 footage on the other hand plays on the Roku without converting and is pleasing to the eye. Audio pickup is good for going Rode-less.
R2D2
MAC wrote:RLight wrote:Thought I'd throw in a few shots from the weekend as this is a fresh lens. The R50 may share the R10 sensor, but the lens is new-new. SOOC JPEGs, which I might argue, is who it should be. RAWs although flexible, if we're being honest are to fine tune a shot. If the SOOC JPEG didn't need tuning, do you need a RAW? I'll leave it at that. I am a RAW shooter btw...raw could have helped here with highlight recoverycool sunstar reflection going on in this onelooks like even with stm lens, subject tracking worked well in swing modethe best of the bunch, this tele is nice in good light for thesewhere did the wheels goit looks like you are enjoying eye tracking - Canon is really making its great new AF ubiquitous in its latest cameras+1 to your thoughts here.Seeing what SOOC jpegs are like is definitely useful (esp for the intended market, thx RLight), however for anyone willing to venture a little further, RAWs will make this baby absolutely shine!R2
RLight
R2D2 wrote:MAC wrote:RLight wrote:Thought I'd throw in a few shots from the weekend as this is a fresh lens. The R50 may share the R10 sensor, but the lens is new-new. SOOC JPEGs, which I might argue, is who it should be. RAWs although flexible, if we're being honest are to fine tune a shot. If the SOOC JPEG didn't need tuning, do you need a RAW? I'll leave it at that. I am a RAW shooter btw...raw could have helped here with highlight recoverycool sunstar reflection going on in this onelooks like even with stm lens, subject tracking worked well in swing modethe best of the bunch, this tele is nice in good light for thesewhere did the wheels goit looks like you are enjoying eye tracking - Canon is really making its great new AF ubiquitous in its latest cameras+1 to your thoughts here.Seeing what SOOC jpegs are like is definitely useful (esp for the intended market, thx RLight), however for anyone willing to venture a little further, RAWs will make this baby absolutely shine!R2I’ll get cooking with the RAWs, have no fear. Just have less time these days…
RLight
Colorado4X4 wrote:Really nice shots! I’m looking to upgrade my M50 mainly for video quality to the R50 or something else, but I have no complaints about image quality in the M50. Looks like it’s doing a great job!I will say watch the lenses, the R50 although spectacular outdoors in Sunny16, those new even darker lenses naturally do even more poorly indoors. My R3 ain't bitting the dust, not that I was planning on it.