I've got a nikon D7000 DSLR and a 24-70 (equivalent) constant f4 zoom. I've had this gear for years and like it but it is damn heavy and bulky. I hauled it around italy twice and I got really tired of hauling a whale around.I finally decided I need a replacement for travel that isn't a whale and decided (?) on the X-100V. Light, compact supposed to take great pictures. I was just about to order it when I started to wonder: how is an X-100V with a 35mm (eq) lens any different than just getting a fixed 35mm (eq) lens for my nikon and just traveling with that?So now I'm "stuck" - do I still get the X-100V or do I get the lens for my Nikon? I like the dials on the fuji. When traveling my pictures are almost exclusively things that don't move so - architecture & landscapes mostly, never people.Any advice?

timoteotresgatos wrote:how is an X-100V with a 35mm (eq) lens any different than just getting a fixed 35mm (eq) lens for my nikon and just traveling with that?One big difference: the X100v is waaaay smaller and waaaay more lightweight.So now I'm "stuck" - do I still get the X-100V or do I get the lens for my Nikon? I like the dials on the fuji.There's not only the dials, also think about the film simulations for example.When traveling my pictures are almost exclusively things that don't move so - architecture & landscapes mostly, never people.Any advice?A friend of mine was in a similar situation and now went for the X100v. Happy so far.BR,Martin

For a small fixed lens "walk around" camera take a look at the Ricoh GR3.I have one and would say that it is a joy to use.Only negative, not to me, is the lack of a viewfinder.

timoteotresgatos wrote:I was just about to order it when I started to wonder: how is an X-100V with a 35mm (eq) lens any different than just getting a fixed 35mm (eq) lens for my nikon and just traveling with that?So now I'm "stuck" - do I still get the X-100V or do I get the lens for my Nikon? I like the dials on the fuji. When traveling my pictures are almost exclusively things that don't move so - architecture & landscapes mostly, never people.Any advice?The X100V already is much lighter (about 300g, that's quite a lot!) and much more compact than your D7000, even when the DSLR has no lens attached, the X100V is still thinner. Next up with the Fuji you'll gain access to a high quality electronic viewfinder, an EVF in my opinion offers more flexibility and control over your shots compared to a traditional DSLR OVF - in addition the X100 has the hybrid viewfinder which allows you to use a more rangefinder style OVF.So if a more compact and lighter setup is your goal, the Fuji has major advantages over your other option, however it is a lot more expensive. Another alternative, as it has been suggested already, would be another high-quality fixed lens camera like the Ricoh GR-III, which offers a 28mm f2.8 lens, yet is missing a viewfinder, which would be critical for my own use.

In theory there is no difference (well besides the mechanical differences) between the X100V and your D7000 with a 23mm lens; however, if bulk is your concern....

The X100V is much lighter and a very refined camera, with a lot of features you’ll probably find delightful: EVF, ND filter, film sims, quiet shutter, etc. I think you’ll find it to be a totally different experience from your DSLR.The Ricoh GR, which has come up above, is even more different. I have one and love it, but it’s quirky. Replacing a DSLR with an X100V is like replacing an SUV with a sports car. Replacing it with a GR is like buying a motorcycle.I say get the X100V! It’s a wonderful camera.

I would rent an X-100V for a few days. Coming from a Nikon DSLR is a huge change. You might love it or wonder why you made the change.For what it’s worth in $, rent one and give it a spin. Good hunting!

Just get the 100v, you won't be disappointed.There's a reason it's so popular, it's just a fun camera to use! I always have mine with me.

There's a vast difference in everyday portability between your Nikon DSLR with a 35mm lens, and the Fuji X100V. It may not be pocketable, but it will fit easily into a shoulder bag or backpack and it doesn't weigh too much.If you are looking for a companion camera that's always with you, then the Fuji X100V is the one to go for. Apart from all its qualities that have already been mentioned in this thread, it is also a beautifully crafted camera. Along with the X-Pro series, the X-100V is just gorgeous to own, carry and use.

Everyone has pretty much laid out all of the best arguments for the X100V except one: it's just a really, really fun camera to own. Like, addictively so. I've never owned a camera that made me want to get out and shoot in the way the X100 series does. The dials are just fun, the image quality is great, the film sims are fun, the field of view really is perfect for everyday shooting, and the camera looks fantastic (which counts).Also, you have just about everything you'd need at your fingertips. Flash, ND filter, OVF/EVF hybrid, weather sealing, excellent video ability...It's remarkably complete and lacks next to nothing.

The 100V is simply a great all-around camera... the comment just prior nails it - there is something about the X100 series that has you wanting to pick it up... again... and again....At this point the V is refined to a point where there isn't much left to improve... you won't be disappointed, as you can always have it with you without the deliberation of deciding if you want to carry your camera today.features that make it viable, IMO:great 2.0 lens, film recipes, weatherproof (with the adapter/filter), flip-screen is an unanticipated bonus (for me I didn't think it would make a difference), image quality is just like XT 3/4 Pro...

I bought an x100f to compliment my Nikon DSLR because I wanted a pocketable, small, and quiet camera for family and casual shooting. Ended up liking it so much that I sold all my Nikon stuff and got an x-t4 to use as my main camera. So, be careful!

Wow! That's a HUGE difference in size. Incredible! Even with a  non-zoom lens the D7000 is a whale. I'm convinced! Thanks!

You will also find the shooting experience completely different.  On top of that, there's the gorgeous film simulations you'll get with the X-100V.

I've got a Leica (Leica-sonic)  D-LUX4 which doesn't have a viewfinder like the Ricoh. I don't like shooting that way , mostly because of the glare. I doubt I'll ever buy another camera without a viewfinder.  The Ricoh is definitely interesting otherwise.

thanks everyone! It sounds like the X-100V is a favorite. In this thread there is a photo showing a comparison between the X-100V and the D7000 with a non-zoom lens and the difference in size isstillincredible - the D7000 is still a beached whale even with that lens!Everyone seem to love their X-100V and I'm convinced!

I had Nikon D7500 and a zoom. Sold and happy with X-100V. For me, the leaf shutter is priceless.Disclaimer: Had the X-100S and X-100F while using a Nikon D810. So Moving to X-100V was not a big unknown to me.

Why is the leaf shutter important to you? I know little about them.

timoteotresgatos wrote:Why is the leaf shutter important to you? I know little about them.Virtually no shutter shock so you can hand-hold at least one stop slower, and high speed flash sync so you can use it for fill flash in bright light.

I have an X100V and a Ricoh GRiii.  For ease of use and compactness I prefer the Ricoh hands down.   There is a high learning curve figuring out the Fuji.The Ricoh can fit in your pocket.