This is why I wanted the D850 to have a 24Mpx (36 at most) BSI CMOS sensor - not the 45.7Mpxel...... Locked

vbuhay

Not my picture - but Daniel Venter's " A7III + Nikkor 200mm f2 ais Manual focus and using focus peaking" www.shootcreatecaptivate.comJust saying.....Nikon are you listening?


James Lotto

You are opening a can of worms....D850 Sensor could easily match that and more.


vbuhay

James Lotto wrote:You are opening a can of worms....D850 Sensor could easily match that and more.Somebody please show me....this is a good a place as any to demonstrate it... I am very very tempted to try that A7III...200mm AIS f2.0 lens?


lickity split

vbuhay wrote:Just saying.....Nikon are you listening?Put the 200/2 on any of your bodies and your in business...


theonetruepath

As long as we're playing "this is not my photograph". Here's one of a steady stream going by on the FB D850 group. There were a couple that looked exactly like the shot you posted but too far back to find now.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2087825814797432&set=gm.1926603674297899&type=3&theater&ifg=1


T O Shooter

First, the 850 was never going to have a 24mp sensor. I feel safe in saying that when the D850 was put in development going backward in sensor mp was never thought about, discussed or anything else.Also, what do you think you're seeing in that image that a D850, D810, and probably some other Nikon's couldn't capture??  While I don't do portraits, I'm sure some of that image is attributable to the photographer.


MrHollywood

T O Shooter wrote:First, the 850 was never going to have a 24mp sensor. I feel safe in saying that when the D850 was put in development going backward in sensor mp was never thought about, discussed or anything else.Also, what do you think you're seeing in that image that a D850, D810, and probably some other Nikon's couldn't capture?? While I don't do portraits, I'm sure some of that image is attributable to the photographer.Exactly....We've all seen shots of this quality from a TON of Canon, Nikon, Pentax and so on.There's NOTHING about that shot that is beyond an old d700...and I've seen better with even older cameras, so let's not go down St. Silly Blvd.Rob


Dan_168

I am so glad Nikon didn't think so and introduced this new 46MP sensor.


abetancort

Was the photographer or the camera that got the picture, even though for my taste the photo is not within my taste.


NotASpeckOfCereal

vbuhay wrote:James Lotto wrote:You are opening a can of worms....D850 Sensor could easily match that and more.Somebody please show me....this is a good a place as any to demonstrate it... I am very very tempted to try that A7III...200mm AIS f2.0 lens?I follow Daniel's work. He's got great cameras and great lenses, but I see people produce mediocre work using the same gear.He's got some great post-processing kung fu and he knows how to get what he wants (good eye and vision on his intended results), and he could probably do just as well with the D850.But I guess mostly I don't understand your statement about Nikon listening. Why don't you just go get an A7 if you think that's what you need?Chris


NotASpeckOfCereal

T O Shooter wrote:Also, what do you think you're seeing in that image that a D850, D810, and probably some other Nikon's couldn't capture?? While I don't do portraits, I'm sure some of that image is attributable to the photographer.Spot on.


vbuhay

lickity split wrote:vbuhay wrote:Just saying.....Nikon are you listening?Put the 200/2 on any of your bodies and your in business...200mm F2 AIS?One of the reason for Nikons marketing decision to use the 45.7 Mps...was to one up all and forces us to : Upgrade to the latest Nikon lenses....


vbuhay

NotASpeckOfCereal wrote:vbuhay wrote:James Lotto wrote:You are opening a can of worms....D850 Sensor could easily match that and more.Somebody please show me....this is a good a place as any to demonstrate it... I am very very tempted to try that A7III...200mm AIS f2.0 lens?I follow Daniel's work. He's got great cameras and great lenses, but I see people produce mediocre work using the same gear.He's got some great post-processing kung fu and he knows how to get what he wants (good eye and vision on his intended results), and he could probably do just as well with the D850.But I guess mostly I don't understand your statement about Nikon listening. Why don't you just go get an A7 if you think that's what you need?ChrisI do not like EVFs (realtime Lag), I love my Nikkors and Tamrons....I Like a lighter, less bulkier body with highest Dynamic Range and a fast 10 FPS..... that is all!


L Copps

The 45.7 mp resolution was chosen to create the most versatel ILC on the planet that could go toe to toe with any other camera and it does. I wouldn't have it any other way.However you do reveal an important point: Nikon has a gaping hole in its lineup for a serious professional medium resolution DSLR.


vbuhay

L Copps wrote:The 45.7 mp resolution was chosen to create the most versatel ILC on the planet that could go toe to toe with any other camera and it does. I wouldn't have it any other way.However you do reveal an important point: Nikon has a gaping hole in its lineup for a serious professional medium resolution DSLR.We all have our want on what we take pictures of as well how that picture should look like..... to get there, we have our abilities and equipment to rely on...we have a finite amount of influence as to the dynamic range of the sensor (or film) we can use. For me the higher the dynamic range of my sensor, the larger the depth of my canvas, the more flexibility I have to capture the image I have in my mind. Which is why I wish for a D760? my rationale are  - I do not like EVFs (realtime Lag), I love my Nikkors and Tamrons....I Like a lighter, less bulkier body with highest Dynamic Range and a fast 10 FPS..... that is all!I think I would love to have the A7III sensor in a smaller D850 body...


iwannabesedated

vbuhay wrote:Just saying.....Nikon are you listening?Decent enough pic, but it hardly supports the point you're trying to make. If I had any interest in a low megapixel camera, I might have bought a D750 (which could easily produce a similarly decent pic, as could dozens of other cameras). -iwbs


iwannabesedated

MrHollywood wrote:...so let's not go down St. Silly BlvdWell put, although I'm convinced that a lot of dpr members live on that street. -iwbs


vbuhay

iwannabesedated wrote:vbuhay wrote:Just saying.....Nikon are you listening?Decent enough pic, but it hardly supports the point you're trying to make. If I had any interest in a low megapixel camera, I might have bought a D750 (which could easily produce a similarly decent pic). -iwbsI do not see the D750 as a low Mpix DSLR, I have one since 2014....I do not like the contraints the high density (smaller pixel) sensors on Dynamic Range and amplify lens faults. Its like stitching phone pictures.100 phone pictures stitch together is still a phone picture.....


vbuhay

No text.


altair8800

http://evan-theelectricalengineer.blogspot.co.il/2013/10/nikon-d800e-vs-nokia-lumia-1020.htmlBet you could not stitch a hundred of those. One may be as good as your example.


Pages
1 2 3 4 5 6 7